A Brief History of Doubt, Backwards (Part II)

And then that odd Danish hunchback, a man who pre-emptively dumped the love of his life because he thought he (not she) had a bad personality. Bow down to Soren Kierkegaard, sarcastically arguing for a passionate, struggling faith, one full of “fear and trembling,” in Paul’s phrase, and a radical submission to a God that is absurd.

Danish hunchbackHis God, like Barth’s, has personality.

And then all this Otherness is watered down, in a gradual process, like a cat growing old. Hegel and Baruch Spinoza talk about a God that – far from being utterly apart from creation – actually was creation; that God and matter are the same. And the so-called first Quest for the Historical Jesus, wherein brave souls such as David Strauss get fired and die in shame-based circumstances simply for arguing that miracles don’t happen.

Miracles do happen, my friends. Just not to you.

And for the record, Thomas Jefferson, most elegant of Founding Fathers, did not believe that Jesus was divine. (Some modern political parties would be shocked – outraged – to discover just how skeptical the Framers were.)

We’re in the 19th century. And religion is getting anonymized. That is Deism, Natural Theology, academic Protestants – everyone in a rush to define the big Faith under all the little faiths. We can blame the Reformation, I think: with no command center, no network of monasteries and convents to contain the passions of the devout and the insane, it gives an impression of confusion.

As we move on, we find the German Friedrich Schleiermacher writing On Religion, a beautiful little book that begins the very same Liberal theology Barth rejects a century later. Schleiermacher has a kind of soft, mystical quality that we here at the God Project Dot Net find very appealing. What he says is hard to deny: that religion is never wholly rational, that it is a “feeling of ultimate dependence.”

Note that feeling?

Now, we’d like to skip over Kant because we don’t quite get him. We never will. What can we say about a person who discovered the space-time continuum just by thinking hard enough? Yikes. He defended God, “proved” there was life after death. Surprised?

The 18th century. A few, very few, philosophers and men of independent means become more skeptical, even as there’s the Second Great Awakening, and the Baal Shem Tov, founder of Jewish Hasidism.


3 responses to “A Brief History of Doubt, Backwards (Part II)

  1. I have to tell you that it’s hard to find your posts in google, i found this one on 17
    spot, you should build some quality backlinks in order to rank your page,
    i know how to help you, just search in google – k2 seo tips and tricks

  2. I see a lot of interesting articles on your page.
    You have to spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of time, there is a tool
    that creates unique, SEO friendly posts in couple
    of minutes, just type in google – laranita’s free
    content source

  3. I read a lot of interesting content here. Probably you spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you
    a lot of work, there is an online tool that creates high quality,
    SEO friendly articles in seconds, just search in google – laranitas free content source

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s