Great Jesus Hoax 3D

It’s sort of funny to watch the late Columbia Professor Morton Smith toy with his adversaries as he defends the authenticity of the so-called “Secret Gospel of Mark,” which he claimed to have stumbled on in a monastery library at Mar Saba, Jerusalem, in 1958. The debate was a like a game.

You can’t catch me, he taunts, through the pages of his recently republished account of the “discovery,” The Secret Gospel. I’m smarter than you!

Like an unrepentant James Frey, Smith starts his screed with this hilarious warning: “No doubt if the past, like a motion picture, could be replayed, I should be shocked to find how much of the story I have already invented. Memory is perhaps more fallacious than forgetfulness.”

Huh? I can only imagine what the publisher of my memoir “Bad Dog (A Love Story)” would have said if I’d put that in my Author’s Note. P.S. I’m making this up!

Despite being a New Testament scholar, Smith was an atheist, driven out of the warm arms of Jesus by mysterious, bad childhood experiences. His Secret Gospel tells a tawdry tale of pedophilia by the Son of God Himself. It also supports Smith’s belief that so-called “miracles” like the raising of Lazarus in John were late accretions to early, non-miraculous gay orgies — um, I mean, events.

Early on in his misremembered account, Smith says, he “cast about, trying to find plausible reasons for assigning both letter and Gospel to the middle ages, the Renaissance, or the seventeenth century.” Or the 20th? For reasons he doesn’t share, he decided it was genuine. In other words, the least likely explanation became for him obvious.

Okay. He then decides Jesus must have baptized his followers (although this is not mentioned in our actual Gospels). And in a spurt of camp humor he writes [enhanced by my italics and “!”]:

“Thus the body of each possessed Christian is in effect a part (a “member,” that is a hand or foot or whatever [!]) of the body of the Messiah, who lives and acts [!] in [!] them all.” (p94)

But Jesus was not content to act in his disciples bodies — oh, no. He also enjoyed other baptismal actions, as Smith hints in a snickering footnote:

“Manipulation, too, was probably involved; the stories of Jesus’ miracles give a very large place to the use of his hands.”

Heh heh. Get it? Read this with learned commentaries from Professors Beavis and Butthead.

Smith goes on to argue that most likely (1) Jesus wrote stuff, (2) it was “suppressed”, and (3) it was suppressed because of its “libertine content” [i.e., tales of orgiastic initiations]. No evidence exists for any of these (3) points.

So twisted does Smith’s pretzel logic become that at one point he actually says:

“So the total neglect of the letter [containing the Secret Gospel] through seventeen centuries argues for its authenticity.” (p136)

Whassup? Smith seems to be inventing a new historical principle here: If there’s no evidence that something happened, that proves it happened!

Interesting. A recent book by Stephen Carlson called The Gospel Hoax lays out compelling reasons to think Smith forged the Gospel himself as a younger man. In addition to a devastating dissection of the letter’s handwriting, Carlson shows how Smith embedded clues to his own identity within the Gospel. Amazing.

Augustine got it right, after all: The ultimate reason for the Fall of Man is narcissism!


3 responses to “Great Jesus Hoax 3D

  1. This is one heck of a great story. I’d never heard it until I read this article.

    “Memory is perhaps more fallacious than forgetfulness”. I’m going to spend the next 24 hours in deep meditation thinking of only these words. I’m pretty sure I’ll gain enlightenment. That might be the best koan I’ve ever heard.

  2. Isn’t this a great story? I stumbled on it myself and can’t believe so many people took this “Gospel” so secretly for so long … Smith seems like one of those arrogant types who enjoy taunting people. Luckily for him, he was also (apparently) brilliant and could construct an argument for everything. But stepping back, the whole thing is just ludicrous! Makes me glad I’m not an academic. Hope the meditation is going well 🙂

  3. george schoellkopf

    Smith was a great scholar and his critics are nothing of the sort. Fundamentalist Christians will go to any lengths to discredit anyone who disagrees with their beliefs – never mind the truth. Jesus would not approve of their hypocrisy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s